Definition: Then I saw that she was defiled, [that] they [took] both one way,

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Ezekiel 23:13. It's a pretty serious and somewhat unsettling passage about a woman. Here’s the explanation in simpler terms: What it says: “Then I saw that she was defiled, [that] they [took] both one way.” Let’s unpack it piece by piece: “I saw” : This is the key part. It's a first-person perspective – it’s like someone witnessing something. “That she was defiled” : This means that the woman, who is referred to as “she,” has been corrupted or stained in some way. "Defiled" suggests a violation of God’s law and goodness. It's not just a simple mistake; it's a significant moral failing. Think of it like a stain on her character or a transgression against divine order. “[That] they [took] both one way” : This is the crucial part that adds to the gravity. “They” refers to a group of people – likely leaders or influential figures. The phrase "one way" means they chose a particular path, direction, or action. It suggests they deliberately acted in a way that was wrong or harmful. So, putting it all together: The verse describes a situation where God has witnessed a transgression committed by a woman and those around her. They made a choice – a specific path – that resulted in something morally bad or harmful. What does this mean in the context of the Bible? This is often interpreted as a warning about the dangers of pride, disobedience, and the potential for corruption within a group of people. It suggests that even seemingly respected individuals can be led astray. It's a reminder to stay vigilant against temptation and maintain moral integrity. Important Note: The meaning of this verse has been debated throughout history. Different interpretations exist about what specifically "she" represents, and what the “one way” signifies. It’s a complex passage that speaks to themes of sin, leadership, and the importance of righteousness. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the historical context surrounding this passage? Explore a specific interpretation of it?